DENTAL AMALGAM

Would you like to give a feedback about these notes?
Please
click here.
INDEX
Definitions
Amalgam: Alloy of mercury with one or more metals.
Amalgam alloy: Alloy which combines with mercury to form amalgam.
Dental amalgam alloy: Alloy that is combined with mercury to form amalgam
used for dental purposes.
Amalgamation: Setting reaction of amalgam alloy with mercury.
Trituration: The act of mixing amalgam alloy with mercury.
Condensation: The process of placing the plastic amalgam mass into the
tooth cavity and applying forces on it to adapt amalgam to the cavity walls.
Burnishing: The act of smoothening the surface and margins of amalgam
after condensation.
History
Amalgam was first used by the Chinese. There is a mention of Silver-Mercury
paste by Su Kung (A.D. 659) in the Chinese materia medica.
- 1578: Li Shihchen used 100 parts of Hg, 45 parts of Ag and 900 parts
of Sn.
- 1826: Introduction of Silver-Mercury paste (pate-d'argent) by Peter
O. Taveau of Paris, France.
- 1833: Introduction of Silver-Mercury paste in the USA by Crawcore
brothers.
- 1870: Elisha Townsend & J.F.Flagg improvised amalgam alloy composition.
- 1895: G.V.Black improvised composition of dental amalgam alloy which
was in use for many years. (67.5% Ag; 27.5% Sn; 5% Cu).
- 1900: Introduction of Copper amalgam.
- 1963: Introduction of Admixed amalgam alloy by Innes and Youdelis.
Classification of Amalgam Alloys
According to content
- Silver Amalgam: Silver more than 65%.
- Copper Amalgam: 70% Hg and 30% Cu.
- Preamalgamated alloys: Contain less than 3% of Hg.
- Noble metal amalgam alloys: Contain Au and/or Pd.
According to presence or absence of Zinc
- Zinc-containing alloys: More than 0.01% Zn.
- Zinc-free alloys: Less than 0.01% Zn.
According to Copper content
- Low Copper alloys (2-4% Cu)
- High copper alloys (13-30% Cu)
- Admixed alloy ( 1/3rd Low Cu + 2/3rd Ag-Cu eutectic)
- Unicompositional or Single compositional alloy
According to number of metals in the alloy
- Binary alloy: Ag; Sn
- Ternary alloy: Ag; Sn; Cu
- Quarternary alloys: Ag; Sn; Cu; In.
According to the shape of alloy particles
- Spherical (Smooth shaped spheres)
- Spheroidal (Irregular shaped spheres)
- Lathe-cut (Irregular shavings or filings)
- Micro-cut
- Fine-cut
- Coarse cut
According to development of Amalgam alloys
- 1st generation amalgam alloys
- G.V.Black's formulation of 3parts Ag and 1 part Sn
- 2nd generation amalgam alloys
- Addition of 4% Cu (to ê plasticity) and upto 1% Zn (scavenger)
- 3rd generation amalgam alloys
- 4th generation amalgam alloys
- Ternary alloys - Addition of Cu to Ag and Sn to form Ag2CuSn.
- 5th generation amalgam alloys
- Quarternary alloys - Ag, Sn, Cu, and Indium. Almost no Sn available to
react with Hg.
- 6th generation amalgam alloys
- Ag-Cu-Pd eutectic alloy (62%, 28%, and 10% respectively) is added in
a ratio of 1:2 to low Cu alloy.
Composition of Amalgam
Alloys
Low Copper Alloys
Silver |
68-72% |
Tin |
26-28% |
Copper |
02-04% |
Zinc |
00-02% |
Admixed Alloys
1/3rd lathe cut eutectic alloys, either
Silver |
71.9% |
Copper |
28.1% |
or
Silver |
62% |
Copper |
28% |
Palladium |
10% |
with 2/3rd lathe-cut or spherical low Copper alloy.
Ternary Alloys
|
Sybraloy |
Tytin |
Silver |
40% |
60% |
Tin |
30% |
27% |
Copper |
30% |
13% |
Quarternary Alloys
Silver |
40-60% |
Tin |
22-35% |
Copper |
13-30% |
Indium |
5% |
Spherical particles of a ternary Ag-Sn-Cu alloy with lathe-cut particles containing
Ag3Sn or Ag-Sn-Cu has been called as Hybrid System. E.g., Arjalloy, Contour,
Oralloy, Permitec, Vivalloy HR.
Effects of Various Components of Amalgam Alloys
SILVER |
COPPER |
TIN |
Increases Strength |
Increases Strength |
Decreases Strength |
Increases Expansion |
Increases Expansion |
Decreases Expansion |
Decreases Flow |
Decreases Flow |
Increases Flow |
Decreases Setting time |
Decreases Setting time |
Decreases Setting time |
Increases Corrosion resistance |
Increases Corrosion resistance |
Decreases Corrosion resistance |
|
Decreases Plasticity |
Increases Plasticity |
|
Increases Hardness |
|
|
Increases Brittleness |
|
ZINC |
INDIUM |
GOLD |
Increases Strength |
Increases Strength |
Increases Strength |
Increases Expansion |
Increases Expansion |
Increases Corrosion resistance |
Increases Flow |
Increases Flow |
|
Increases Setting time |
Increases Setting time |
MERCURY |
Decreases Corrosion resistance |
Amalgamation more difficult |
Decreases setting time |
Increases Plasticity |
Deoxidiser |
Decreases
delayed expansion |
Decreases Hardness |
|
Decreases Brittleness |
|
|
Scavenger |
|
|
Mercury
is used in less than 3% in pre-amalgamated alloys. Mercury is incorporated by
washing alloy particles with Mercuric Chloride. To remove excess chloride on
the surface of the particles, the alloy particles are washed in acid waters.
These acid waters remove zinc on the surface of the alloy particles along with
chloride. Since zinc is responsible for delayed expansion, its removal results
in reduced delayed expansion in pre-amalgamated alloys.
Note: Gallium
may be used instead of Hg to form Cu-Ga-Sn intermetallic compound. These Silver-Gallium
alloys are still in experimental stage. More about these later!
Manufacture of Amalgam Alloys
Filings: Filings are irregularly shaped particles. Ingredients are
melted and poured into a mould of 3.8 cm diam and 20-25 cm length. An ingot
is obtained by cooling which is then heated to 400°C for 6 to 8 hrs for homogenization.
Ingot is then lathe cut or ball milled. Cut particles are then passed through
a fine sieve of 100 mesh. Ageing is performed by heating to 60-100 °C for 1
to 6 hrs. To make the particles more reactive, surface treatment with acid waters
may be done. Size of the particles vary from 28-35µ.
Spherical particles: These are produced by atomizing the molten alloy
in a closed chamber filled with inert gas. Droplets of alloy solidify into spheres
as they fall through the gas to the floor of the chamber. The solidified spheres
are then heat-treated and acid washed. Size of spheres may vary from 2-4µ to
25-35µ.
Setting Reaction
This is a process by which liquid Hg reacts with dental amalgam alloy particles
to produce a matrix of intermetallic compounds of Hg with metals of the alloy.
Low Copper alloys
Ag3Sn |
 |
Hg |
 |
Ag2Hg3 |
 |
Sn7Hg8 |
 |
Ag3Sn |
Excess γ phase |
|
|
|
γ1 Phase |
|
γ2 Phase |
|
Unreacted γ Phase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Unreacted γ phase is bound by a matrix of γ1 and γ2 phases.
- γ Phase: Highest strength (32-35% volume of set amalgam)
- γ1 phase: .
Highest resistance to corrosion. (54-56%)
- γ2 phase: Least strength and resistance to corrosion (11-13%)
Admixed alloys
Reaction 1 |
Ag3Sn |
 |
Ag3Cu2 |
 |
Hg |
 |
Ag2Hg3 |
 |
Sn7Hg8 |
 |
Ag3Sn |
 |
Ag3Cu2 |
Excess γ phase |
|
Silver-Copper Eutectic |
|
|
|
γ1 Phase |
|
γ2 Phase |
|
Unreacted γ Phase |
|
unreacted Eutectic phase |
Reaction 2 |
Ag3Cu2 |
 |
Sn7Hg8 |
|
|
 |
Ag2Hg3 |
 |
Cu6Sn5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
η (eta) phase |
|
|
|
|
The second reaction occurs at mouth temperature for 1-2 weeks and γ2 phase
is thus eliminated. The matrix is formed by γ1, Cu3Sn ("ε" epsilon)and
η phases.
Single composition alloys
Ag3Sn |
 |
Cu3Sn |
 |
Hg |
 |
Ag2Hg3 |
 |
Cu6Sn5 |
 |
Ag3Sn |
 |
Cu3Sn |
Excess γ phase |
|
Excess ε phase |
|
|
|
γ1 Phase |
|
η (eta) phase |
|
Unreacted γ phase |
|
Unreacted ε phases |
Here no γ2 phase is formed.
Theory behind the setting reaction of unicompositional alloys
Solubility of Hg in Cu is 1 mg, in Ag 10 mg, and in Sn 170 mg. Since the solubility
of Hg is more in Sn, the Sn on the surface of the alloy particles will be depleted
by the formation of γ2 phase, while the percentage of Cu will relatively
increase as a result of limited reaction with Hg. Therefore alloy particles
are surrounded by γ1 and γ2 phases, whereas the periphery of the alloy
particle becomes an eutectic alloy of Ag and Cu. As with admixed alloys, this
Ag-Cu phase reacts with γ2 phase to form η phase and more γ1 phase,
eliminating γ2 phase. So here the alloy particles function like Ag-Sn alloy
initially providing sufficient working time and ease in manipulation.
Sixth generation amalgam alloys
- Reaction 1: Resembles 1st, 2nd, or 3rd generation amalgams.
- Reaction 2: Production of η and γ1 phases.
- Reaction 3: Cu3Pd phase precipitation within γ1 and η phases with
elimination of γ2 phase.
Microstructure of Amalgam
The set mass of amalgam consists of unreacted particles of gamma (γ) and epsilon
(ε) phases surrounded by a matrix of reaction products (γ1, γ2 and η phases).
The reaction between the two constituent materials is a rapid amalgamation of
the outer layers of alloy particles. When once these layers have formed, further
amalgamation proceeds at a slower rate. This surface alloying is a solution
of amalgam alloy in mercury, and is accompanied by reduction in total volume
of metals. Crystallization of the new phases from amalgamated alloy occurs,
while at the same time solution continues inwards towards the centre of the
alloy particles. These two conflicting processes of solution and crystallization
continue until the formation of new phases stifles the solution process.
Properties Of Dental Amalgam
The properties that would be discussed are:
A. Dimensional Change
Expansion that occurs due to reaction of Hg with alloy components is termed
primary expansion or mercuroscopic expansion
.
Expansion that occurs after 1 to 7 days due to moisture contamination during
trituration or condensation before the amalgam mass is set, is termed secondary
expansion or delayed expansion.
There is an initial volumetric
contraction due to reduction in total volume of alloying elements. But as crystallization
of various phases occurs, the impinging of crystals against each other results
in expansion. Release of mercury from γ2 phase during corrosion results
in additional crystallization of phases on reaction with unreacted γ phase,
causing further expansion. This is also termed mercuroscopic expansion.
- Components: Increased γ phase or β phase increased expansion;
Increased traces of Tin, decreased expansion
- Particle size: Decreased size, there is contraction initially (due
to increased surface area/ unit volume and increased dissolution of Hg) but
later expansion (due to outward thrust of forming crystals).
- Particle shape: Smoother shape (as in spherical type) there is better
wetting with Hg causing in faster amalgamation resulting in contraction.
- Hg/Alloy ratio: Increased Hg/Alloy ratio Increased expansion (mercuroscopic)
- Trituration: Rapid trituration and longer trituration within limits
results in contraction because of
- Faster amalgamation
- Decrease in particle size
- Pushing of Hg between particles
- Prevention of outward growth of crystals
- Condensation: Increased condensation pressure causes closer contact
of Hg with alloy particles and squeezing of excess Hg from the mix resulting
in contraction.
- Moisture contamination: Alloys containing Zn, if contaminated with
moisture before amalgam is set, may evince delayed (or) secondary expansion.
This is due to release of H2 gas within the restoration creating
an internal pressure of nearly 2,000 psi. Since the gas cannot escape out,
it causes expansion of the restoration.The gas is formed as follows:
Zn + H2O
ZnO + H2
Effects of dimensional change
Expansion >> 4%
- Pressure on pulp
pain
- High point
occlusal
interference
pain
- Pressure on cavity walls
tooth
fracture
pain
- Greater susceptibility to corrosion
- Expansion over the cavity margins
fracture
of the restoration ("ditched amalgam")
Contraction >> than 50µ/cm
- microleakage
- secondary caries
B. Strength
The approximate values of compressive and tensile strengths of different types
of amalgam are as follows:
|
Compressive Strength (psi) |
Tensile strength (psi) |
|
30 min |
1 hour |
1 day |
7 days |
7 days |
Low Copper Alloys
|
7,500
15,000 |
13,000
24,500 |
62,000
50,000 |
|
8,700
7,250 |
High Copper Alloys
|
10,000
16,000
|
16,000
27,000 |
58,000
65,000 |
62,600
74,000 |
7,250
9,300 |
Factors affecting strength of Dental Amalgam
- Particle size: Decreased size results in increased strength (due
to increased surface area / unit volume)
- Particle shape: Regular uniform shape result increased strength
(due to more wettability, more coherent mass, less interrupted coherent interphases)
- Microstructure of amalgam:
- Increased γ and γ1 phases there is increased strength
- presence of η phase there is increased strength (due to prevention
of grain boundary sliding)
- Increased γ2 phase, there is decreased strength
- Porosities and voids in amalgam: Decreased strength. Formed due
to:
- Decreased trituration
- Decreased condensation pressure
- Irregularly shaped particles
- Insertion of too large increments
- Delayed insertion after trituration
- Too less Hg (amalgam non-plastic)
- Miscalculation of powder particle diameter to occupy available spaces
- Hg/Alloy ratio: Increased Hg/Alloy ratio, decreased strength, because
increased Hg results in
- Decreased unreacted γ phase
- Increased γ2 phase
- Increased residual Hg (weakest phase) within amalgam
- Trituration
- Increased trituration within limits increases strength (due to increased
coherence of matrix crystals).
- Increased trituration beyond limits decreases strength ( due to cracking
of formed crystals decreasing coherence).
- Condensation pressure Increased pressure results in increased strength
(due to removal of excess Hg within amalgam resulting in less residual Hg)
- Temperature Amalgam loses 15% of its strength when its temperature
is increased from room temperature to mouth temperature. It loses 50% of its
strength when temperature is elevated beyond 60°C (as in overjealous polishing).
- Corrosion activity: Decreased corrosion activity results in increased
adhesive integrity and therefore increased strength.
C. Creep
The values of creep of various amalgam alloys are as follows:
Creep (%)
|
Low Copper Alloys
|
02.6
0.8 -1.5 |
High Copper Alloys
|
0.44%
0.05-0.09 |
Creep occurs because of grain boundary sliding. η crystals on γ1
grains prevent grain boundary sliding and therefore are responsible for decreased
creep values of high copper alloys. Higher creep is associated with flow of
amalgam over cavity margins which is thin and easily fractures under occlusal
stress ("ditched amalgam").
Factors affecting Creep
- Microstructure of amalgam
- Increased γ1 fraction, increased creep
- Increased γ2 fraction, increased creep
- Increased grain size of γ1, decreased creep
- Presence of η phase, decreased creep
- Hg/Alloy ratio Increased Hg/Alloy ratio, increased creep (due to
more residual Hg)
- Trituration
- Overtrituration, increased creep
- Undertrituration
- Increased creep
- Decreased creep in lathe-cut amalgam
- Condensation pressure Increased pressure, decreased creep (due to
less residual Hg)
- Delay between trituration and condensation Increased creep
D.
Modulus of elasticity
At low rates of loading, the elastic modulus of amalgam is 11-20 X 103 MN/m2.
At high rates of loading, the elastic modulus is 62 X 103 MN/m2
E. Resistance to corrosion
Passive layer of chlorides, sulphides, and /or oxides seen on amalgam surface
in unhygienic mouths. Electrolytic corrosion of dissimilar portions of
the filling. Corrosion products that form at the margins over a period serve
to seal the marginal gaps. Therefore marginal integrity of amalgam restorations
improves with time. Corrosion resistance of various phases in descending order
are as follows:
- γ phase (maximum resistance to corrosion)
- γ1 phase
- silver-copper eutectic phase
- ε phase
- η phase
- γ2 phase (least resistance to corrosion)
Technical Considerations
A. Selection of the Alloy:
Various factors to be considered are:
- Particle size: Smaller size
rapid hardening, high early strength, smoother surface.
- Particle shape: Whether lathe cut or spherical
.
- Presence or absence of zinc: Responsible for delayed expansion.
- High Cu or Low Cu: High Cu alloys have little or no γ2
phase, which is the weakest phase.
- Rate of hardening: Affects working time.
- Smoothness of the mix.
- Ease of condensation.
- Economical factor: Cheaper brand if all the other factors equal.
Differences between Lathe cut
and Spherical alloys
LATHE CUT
|
SPHERICAL
|
- Require more mercury (50%)
- Require more condensation force
- Overtrituration increases strength
- Undertrituration decreases creep
- Require smaller condenser points
- Less ease in carving and burnishing
|
- Require less mercury (42%)
- Require less condensation force
- Overtrituration decreases strength
- Undertrituration increases creep
- Require broader condenser points
- Smooth surface during carving & burnishing
|
B. Selection of Mercury
Should have less than 0.02% of non-volatile residue.
C. Mercury Alloy ratio
- Lathe cut alloys 1:1 or Eames ratio (50% Hg)
- Spherical alloys 40.0% Hg
- High copper alloys 43.0% Hg
- Low copper alloys 53.7% Hg
Methods of Dispensing Alloy and Hg
- Automatic mechanical dispensers
- Preweighed pellets
- Preproportioned capsules -alloy and Hg separated by disk or membrane
Methods to reduce excess residual Hg
- Squeezing excess Hg in a squeeze cloth after trituration.
- Using "increasing dryness technique" during condensation (amalgam
is condensed layer by layer rather than in bulk; As each layer is condensed,
excess Hg in that layer is expressed and used for binding the subsequent layer
of amalgam that is condensed over the previous one. As layers are sequentially
condensed in a similar manner, amalgam becomes increasingly "dry").
- Reducing Hg/Alloy ratio within limits.
D. Size of the mix
Depends on the cavity. Usually 400mg to 800 mg alloy with adequate
amount of Hg.
E. Trituration
Objectives:
- To dissolve Hg in alloy particles so as to obtain a plastic mass of amalgam
which can be condensed into the cavity. This also achieves a workable mass
with sufficient working time.
- To remove oxide film on the surface of the alloy particles.
- To pulverize the alloy particles for proper wetting by Hg (by decreasing
the particle size and increasing the surface area and thus increasing the
wettability).
Methods:
- With mortar and pestle (trituration pressure 2-3 pounds)
- With mechanical amalgamator
Factors affecting trituration
- Speed - number of unit movements/ unit time
- The thrust of the movement (distance travelled by the mixing arm) - pressure
exerted
- Weight of the capsule and the pestle
- Duration of trituration
- Difference in the size between the pestle and the encasing capsule.
Mulling: After the amalgam alloy and Hg are mixed for a specific time
in the mechanical amalgamator, the pestle is removed and the mix left in place
within the capsule and the amalgamator is turned on for a period of 2 to 3 seconds.
This result in a homogenous mix of the amalgam mass. The improved coherence
of the mix makes it possible to remove the mass as a whole from the capsule.
This process is called mulling. Mulling can be also performed by kneading the
plastic amalgam mix in a piece of rubber dam.
F. Condensation
Objectives:
- To condense unattacked gamma particles closely together (to increase strength
and decrease creep).
- To adapt amalgam to the cavity walls.
- To remove excess Hg.
- To bring Hg on the top of each increment so as to bind the increments to
one another (increasing dryness technique).
- To increase the density of the restoration by development of an uniform
compact mass with minimal voids.
- To increase the rate of hardening so that carving operation need not be
unduly delayed.
Methods:
- Hand condensation
- Mechanical condensation
Condensation pressure: 3 to 4 lbs. For this pressure, force at the tip
of the condenser point of 2 mm diameter is around 600 -800 psi. For 10 lbs of
pressure, the force at the tip of the condenser point of 2 mm diameter is 2,000
psi. However this 10 lbs pressure is manually not possible.
G. Burnishing
Objectives:
- To further decrease the size and number of voids.
- To express excess Hg on the surface of the amalgam restoration.
- To adapt amalgam to the cavosurface anatomy.
- To condition surface of the amalgam for carving.
Method: Performed using Beaver tail burnisher or Sprately burnisher.
H. Carving
Objectives:To produce a restoration with
- No underhangs (no shouldering or shelving).
- Proper physiological contours.
- Minimal flash (no overhangs).
- Functional, non-interfering occlusal anatomy.
- Adequate, compatible marginal ridges.
- Proper size, location, extent and inter-relationship of contact areas.
- Physiologically compatible embrasures.
- No interference with integrity of periodontium.
Method: Performed by using various varieties of amalgam carvers available
( like Hollenback's carver). Carving is always from the tooth surface to the
restoration surface. This is done to avoid removal of amalgam at the margins.
I. Finishing and Polishing
Objectives:
- To remove amalgam flash that has been left behind during carving.
- To remove overhangs, major sometimes.
- To correct minor enamel underhangs.
- To convert superficial amalgam into a relatively inert layer galvanically,
to decrease electrolytic corrosion.
- To remove superficial scratches and irregularities: decreases fatigue failure,
decreases concentration cell corrosion and decreases accumulation or adherence
of plaque.
- To make the restoration aesthetically more appealing.
Method: Performed with extrafine silex, slurry of tin oxide, or pumice-wet
mix in a paste form to avoid heat generation (If temperature is >> 60°C, release
of Hg occurs).
Clinical Considerations
-
Ditched Amalgam: Fracture of amalgam at the margins.
Causes are:
- Inadequate extension of the cavity walls.
- Giving cavosurface bevel to to the cavity.
- High creep value of the amalgam
- Larger volume fraction of γ1
- Presence of γ2 phase (as in low Cu alloys)
- Overtrituration
- Undertrituration (in spherical alloys)
- Delay between trituration and condensation
- High Hg:Alloy ratio
- Failure to squeeze out exess Hg after trituration
- Inadequate condensation pressure (excess residual Hg)
- Delayed expansion due to moisture contamination (flow over the cavity margins)
- Mercuroscopic expansion (Excess residual Hg
- Using high Hg:Alloy ratio
- Failure to squeeze out excess Hg after trituration
- Inadequate condensation pressure
- Corrosion of γ2 phase
- Overfilling
- Excessive (overjealous) burnishing and polishing (flow over the cavity
margins)
- Shallow cavity
- Thick cement base/cavity liner
2. Marginal leakage: Gap formed between the wall of the cavity and
the restored amalgam because of the contraction of the filling material. The
gap formed is a potential area for food impaction and plaque accumulation, which
in turn result in secondary (recurrent) caries. As the restoration ages,
deposition of corrosion products in the gap aid in sealing the margins.
3. Corrosion: If the amalgam surface is not well polished, the rough
surface not only attracts plaque but may also undergo crevicular corrosion.
Uses of Amalgam
- As a filling material for Class I and Class II cavities.
- Can be used for Class V cavities of posterior teeth.
- Sometimes can be used for cuspal restorations (with pins usually).
- As a core build-up material prior to cast restoration.
- As a retrograde filling material.
- In combination with Composite resin for cavities in posterior teeth. Resin
veneer over amalgam.
- As a die material.
Advantages of Amalgam
- Relatively inexpensive.
- Easy to manipulate.
- Restoration is completed within one sitting without requiring much chair
time.
- Well-condensed and triturated amalgams have good compressive strengths.
- Sealing ability improves with age by formation of corrosion products at
tooth-amalgam interface.
- Relatively not technique sensitive.
Disadvantages and Failure
of Amalgam Restorations
- Marginal breakdown and fracture.
- Tarnish and corrosion.
- Unnatural appearance (not aesthetic).
- Metallic taste and Galvanic shock.
- Marginal leakage.
- Discolouration of the tooth structure.
- Lack of chemical or mechanical adhesion to the tooth structure.
- Mercury toxicity.
- High rate of secondary caries.
- Thermal conductivity.
- Promotes plaque adhesion.
- Delayed expansion.
REFERENCES
- Restorative Dental Materials 8/e
- Robert G.Craig
- C.V.Mosby,1992
- Skinner's Science of Dental Materials 9/e
- Ralph W. Phillips
- W.B.Saunders, 1994
- The Clinical Handling of Dental Materials
- Smith
- Wright and Brown PSG Wright, 1986
- Operative Dentistry - Modern Theory and Practice
- Marzouk
- Simonton and Gross Ishiyaku Euroamerican Publishers, 1985.
- Restorative Dental Materials - An Overview (Volume 1)
- Reese J.A. and Valega T.M.
- Federation Dentaire Internationale, 1985
- Dental Amalgam: The State of the Art and Science
- Maxell H. Anderson and Richard B. McCoy
- Dental Clinics of North America, Vol. 37, No.3, July 1993, pages 419
-430.

Would you like to give a feedback about these notes?
Please
click here.
These web pages created and maintained by
Dr
R. V. Subramanyam
Professor, Dept. of Oral
Pathology
College of Dental Sciences, Davangere 577
004
Karnataka, India.